Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Apr 8, 2025.
Public comments (8)
Spoke on behalf of the Bateman Irrevocable Trust, objecting to the station area plan's density allocations, restrictive open space and height requirements, and lack of landowner consent.
City Council Amended - Apr 8, 2025 · 3:39:14 →Attorney for the Bateman Irrevocable Trust stated landowners were not on board, felt strong-armed, and requested the ordinance be tabled.
City Council Amended - Apr 8, 2025 · 3:45:31 →Expressed confusion over newspaper reports regarding State Street discussions and asked about the long-term timeline.
Planning Commission Meeting - Mar 13, 2025 · 1:03:00 →Submitted an online comment opposing the station location, suggesting it should be closer to Cabela's and the Outlets.
Planning Commission Meeting - Mar 13, 2025 · 40:24 →Representing the Bateman Trust, strongly opposed the station area plan, arguing it unfairly reallocates density from their property and creates confusion with municipal area plans.
Planning Commission Meeting - Mar 13, 2025 · 54:32 →Supported the plan for its walkability and alternative transportation options.
Planning Commission Meeting - Mar 13, 2025 · 1:08:20 →Submitted an online comment stating the station should not be near Shadow Ridge Park and should serve existing commercial hubs.
Planning Commission Meeting - Mar 13, 2025 · 40:45 →Expressed skepticism about allocating 34% of the station area plan to professional office space given current market conditions.
Planning Commission Meeting - Mar 13, 2025 · 37:26 →