Traverse Mountain Area Plan

Argued against the rezone, stating the developer had already maxed out their density rights and urging the commission to deny the request.

Expressed opposition to granting new commercial rights on vacant land where residential density was already claimed elsewhere.

Argued that the proposed density transfer is an unacceptable density grab that unwinds key compromises from the 2012 Area Plan and allows the developer to profit from mining West Canyon without building infrastructure.

Shared that he paid extra for a view lot based on the original master plan and park promises, and urged commissioners to reject the proposal.

Raised concerns about wasted municipal infrastructure investments in West Canyon and questioned the impact of high-density vertical apartments.

Highlighted 'do not exceed' clauses in the Area Plan and argued that developers should bear the financial responsibility of developing West Canyon instead of shifting units.

Stressed that districts and density caps were crucial to the original 2012 plan approval and urged the commission to hold Perry Homes to their commitments.

Asked the commission to protect vested rights and noted a lack of studies or justifications supporting the density increase.

Invited commissioners to hike West Canyon to see the environmental damage and dust caused by mass grading, calling it a mining operation rather than preparation for housing.

Pointed out a lack of parks in the southern crossings area and expressed frustration over unfulfilled promises of community amenities.

Shared that he is a first-time homebuyer who paid extra for a view and urged the commission to honor handshake promises made to residents.

Raised serious safety and traffic concerns about the Traverse Terrace and Mountain View intersection, noting past pedestrian accidents.

Expressed distrust of the developer's timeline and argued that packing more units into the area would harm property values and overwhelm schools.

Drew upon his experience as a police officer to argue that high-density apartments bring increased crime, crowding, and water conservation challenges.

Stated that 30 units per acre and 6-7 story buildings are incompatible with existing neighborhoods and lower residents' quality of life.

Argued from a civil engineering background that the proposal is entirely about developer profitability at the expense of residents.

Commented on the Traverse Mountain area plan amendment, noting the area's heavy tourism and importance of keeping the visitor experience in mind.